What is going on in Europe? First France, then the problems in the UK, then:
Uncategorized
Marlin
Chris Pratt’s character in Jurassic World carried a Marlin 1895 in 45-70. At the time, it was listed as the only rifle that could take down a t-rex.

Humor
Bang. Boom. Stab.
There was a joke I heard from my uncle (Mom’s younger brother)
The Polish Army was worried about not having enough rifles to arrange for training. Instead, they issued their new recruits wooden rifles. They told the recruits to yell “Bang! Bang” while they were shooting at other recruits. The same story went with hand grenades- all of the grenades were being used in the war effort, with none left for training. In this case, the recruits were given a segment of weighted broomstick told to yell “BOOM” when they intended to throw a grenade. The same went for bayonet training: they would poke the other recruit with their wooden rifle while yelling “Stab! Stab!”
As luck would have it, one recruit fell through the cracks of Polish Army bureaucracy and was sent into the field without any weapons. Shortly, there was a large battle. They found this private surrounded by dozens of dead German soldiers as he yelled “Bang! Bang! Stab! Boom! Bang!” and so on. Scores of Germans were falling in the wake of his ferocious and false attack.
The Polish generals thought they were on to something, so they created an entire unit on this principle. They won several battles. The generals laughed at the stupidity of the German army, to fall for such a trick.
One day, the Polish unit charged over a hill, then immediately returned, running for their lives, screaming that they had no weapons to hold off the German unit headed their way. Just then, the saw 100 German troops cresting the hill with thier arms extended in what appeared to be a NAZI salute. As the troops grew closer, the Germans could be heard:
“Tank! Tank! Clank! Clank”
Poland fell the next day.
Seeing the below exchange was what reminded me of that story.
Anti American left
Talent
I’m sure each of these people were selected for talent, and in no way was anything approaching DEI was even a small factor.
The rest of the cabinet isn’t pictured. There are only three white dudes, and one of them is openly gay. One of the straight ones earned his spot because during his tenure as Special Agent-in-Charge, a controversial internal memo was leaked from the Richmond Field Office that identified “traditionalist Catholics” as potential violent domestic extremists. He was placed on administrative leave due to his role in the memo. The DOJ Inspector General found that while the memo violated the department’s own standards, it lacked any evidence of bias or malicious intent, but this was during the Biden admin, so take that with a grain of salt.
Nope. Talent, not DEI and politics.
Military
Nuclear Radiological Release
The FAA temporarily closed the airspace around the Savannah River nuclear facility in Aiken, South Carolina due to a fire at the plant that released nuclear contamination at ground level. The FAA imposed a temporary flight restriction over the site, with its notice describing a “U.S. Gov’t Nuclear Incident.” Radiological surveys indicated no detectable levels of contamination.
The Savannah River Site (SRS) was built in the early 1950s to produce tritium and plutonium-239, in support of defense programs. Five reactors and a number of support facilities, including two chemical separation plants, a heavy water extraction plant, a nuclear fuel and target fabrication facility, a tritium extraction facility, and waste management facilities, were built to produce these materials.
The area has since been reopened.
Ghost Story
A GHOSTED Short Story
What follows is a short story set in the Ghosted universe. I originally intended it to be a part of the main story, but just couldn’t find a place to make it fit into the Ghosted universe smoothly. Consider this one to be a short prequel to the full-length one.
The Missing Links
The colonel called it an opportunity, which should have been my first warning.
I was Staff Sergeant Christina Woods, MOS 7314, an unmanned aircraft systems operator in the United States Marine Corps. I’d spent most of my career flying drones, which meant I spent a considerable amount of time staring at screens while somebody else decided what I ought to be looking at.
I was good at it. Good enough that my commanding officer had apparently recommended me for a classified experimental program.
“What kind of program, sir?”
“Neural interface research.”
I waited for him to explain.
“The idea is to connect an operator directly to an unmanned aircraft. Eliminate the conventional controls. Reduce response time. Improve situational awareness.”
“You’re talking about putting something in my head?”
“That’s part of it.”
“What happened to the last people who tried it?” He looked down at the folder on his desk. “Let’s just say there have been mixed results.”
That wasn’t encouraging. “Am I being ordered to volunteer, sir?”
“Absolutely not, Staff Sergeant. Participation is entirely voluntary.”
He slid the folder across the desk. “Of course, I’d hate to tell headquarters that my best drone operator wasn’t interested.”
There it was: I wasn’t volunteering, I was being voluntold. I took the folder.
The project occupied several buildings at a research facility that had once belonged to the Air Force. There was no school, no established curriculum, and certainly no instructors who had done what we were being asked to do. There were doctors, engineers, neuroscientists, and a few military officers who seemed to spend most of their time asking when the equipment would be ready.
There were also three other Marines in my group. The four of us weren’t the first candidates. Six small groups had come through before us, although nobody would tell us exactly how many people had received implants or how many had successfully completed the program.
One of the engineers described the results as promising. A doctor described them as inconclusive. I noticed neither used the word successful.
The screening took three weeks. Psychological examinations, neurological scans, reaction-time testing, and enough blood samples to make me wonder whether they were planning to take it all.
Then came the surgery. The implant was supposed to be a single procedure. Mine required two, with the first operation installing the interface and its connections. The second, eleven days later, corrected a problem with one of the connections that hadn’t responded properly during testing.
Recovery was miserable. My head hurt. Certain sounds seemed unnaturally loud. I occasionally experienced a sensation like somebody brushing the back of my neck, even when nobody was near me. The doctors recorded everything.
They were very good at recording things, but explaining them was another matter.
Six weeks after the first operation, I sat in front of a monitor while an engineer prepared to activate the link. “We’ll begin with basic directional commands,” he said. “Think of the aircraft moving forward.”
A small quadrotor rested on a platform in the adjoining room. I concentrated.
Nothing happened.
“Try to visualize the motion.”
“I am.”
“Perhaps imagine pushing a joystick.”
“Then why did you put a computer in my skull?”
He didn’t appreciate that. We tried again.
This time I felt something. Not a movement exactly, but a peculiar sense of balance, as though part of me were leaning in a direction my body hadn’t moved. The quadrotor lifted six inches.
The engineer nearly fell out of his chair.
The next three months were equal parts progress and frustration.
Nobody knew how to teach us to use the implants. The engineers understood the software and the doctors understood the anatomy, but neither could tell us what a neural connection was supposed to feel like. We had to figure that out ourselves.
The interface wasn’t like controlling an aircraft with my hands. At first, I kept trying to translate familiar control movements into thoughts. That worked poorly. Things improved when I stopped thinking about controls and began thinking about what I wanted the aircraft to do.
It wasn’t automatic. I still needed to understand the machine, its limitations, and the consequences of every maneuver. But the connection removed a layer between intention and action.
I could fly more precisely. I could respond faster. Eventually, I could look through the aircraft’s camera without constantly referring to a monitor.
That was the strangest part.
I wasn’t seeing two separate pictures. I was aware of both my surroundings and the drone’s view, although concentrating on one made the other less distinct. The researchers were delighted.
Some of my classmates weren’t doing nearly as well. Staff Sergeant Palmer had been an excellent conventional operator. His initial link tests were better than mine, but after a few weeks he began complaining of headaches and dizziness. Then he started having trouble disconnecting.
He told me once that he could still feel the aircraft moving after the power had been shut off.
Another candidate experienced periods of confusion following extended sessions. She occasionally lost track of whether a sound had come from the room around her or from the aircraft’s microphone. The doctors called it neural adaptation disorder.
They didn’t know what caused it. Palmer was eventually removed from training. So was the other Marine.
Neither had done anything wrong. Their implants simply weren’t working the way the researchers expected. I asked one of the doctors whether the same thing could happen to me.
“We haven’t identified a reliable predictor,” he said.
That was a very scientific way of saying he didn’t know his ass from third base. Training and testing continued.
One of my earliest field test deployments was to Venezuela. We were attached to a Marine platoon that was there to train Venezuelan government forces in warfare tactics. Officially, I was there to evaluate unmanned aircraft operations under field conditions.
Only a handful of people knew about the implant.
The aircraft was a modified reconnaissance drone with conventional controls available as a backup. My neural interface handled flight and sensor positioning. There was no artificial intelligence making decisions for me, no automated battlefield management, and no way to control weapons through the link.
I was still a drone operator, just a rather unusual one. The exercise had been running for four days when somebody started shooting. At first, I thought the gunfire was part of the training scenario. Then the exercise controller began shouting over the radio.
A cartel force had attacked a Venezuelan security position several miles from our location. The attack was coordinated, and the Venezuelans were taking casualties. Our Marines were ordered to assist with evacuation and security.
My drone was already airborne. I turned toward the reported contact and found two trucks moving along a dirt road toward the fighting. I zoomed in.
Armed men filled the truck beds. “Two vehicles approaching from the northwest,” I reported. “Approximately fifteen armed personnel. They’re about three kilometers out.”
The Marine lieutenant asked for a grid. I gave him one, then spotted another group moving through the brush east of the road. “Additional personnel east of the vehicles. They’re moving toward your right flank.”
The lieutenant redirected his Marines. For the next several hours, I flew, watched, and talked.
The neural connection made an enormous difference. I could maneuver the aircraft and follow moving targets without taking my attention away from the larger picture. I wasn’t faster at thinking, exactly. I simply spent less time translating what I wanted into control inputs.
That saved seconds. Sometimes seconds mattered.
The fighting continued into the evening. The cartel force withdrew, regrouped, and attacked again the following morning. We remained in the area for several days, supporting Venezuelan troops and helping locate armed groups moving through the surrounding countryside.
I worked in shifts, sleeping when I could and connecting whenever the aircraft was needed. By the time the operation ended, I’d accumulated thirty-seven hours of neural-link time during actual combat operations.
My total link hours were considerably higher, but those thirty-seven were different. During training, a mistake meant a damaged drone and an unhappy engineer.
In Venezuela, a mistake could mean somebody died.
On the third day, I identified a group of armed men approaching a Marine position through a drainage ditch. The lieutenant had been preparing to move his people forward.
I warned him. He stopped the movement, repositioned his Marines, and waited. The attackers came into view exactly where I’d told him they would.
Afterward, the lieutenant found me beside the ground-control station. “How the hell did you spot them that fast?”
“Been watching them for ten minutes, sir.”
“While you were tracking those trucks?”
“Yes, sir.”
He looked at the drone, then at me. “Whatever they’re paying you, it isn’t enough.” I didn’t tell him about the implant. He wouldn’t have believed me anyway.
The after-action review lasted longer than the operation. The engineers wanted performance data. The doctors wanted neurological examinations. The officers wanted to know whether the system could be replicated.
That last question was the difficult one.
The program had produced only a few reliable operators. Some candidates couldn’t establish a useful link at all. Others developed symptoms severe enough to end their participation, but nobody understood why.
I underwent another series of examinations. My implant was functioning normally, although the doctors admitted they still didn’t know what normal meant.
Then I received orders to report to a meeting with the program director. There were two colonels, a civilian scientist, and a Navy commander waiting for me.
“Staff Sergeant Woods,” one of the colonels began, “we’ve been reviewing your performance in Venezuela.”
“Yes, sir.”
“Your results suggest applications beyond unmanned aircraft control.”
I said nothing.
“We’re considering expanding the program to include communications, electronic systems, and battlefield integration.”
“That’s quite a jump from flying drones, sir.”
“It is.”
The civilian leaned forward. “We believe the interface could eventually allow an operator to interact directly with multiple systems.”
“Can it?”
“We don’t know.”
At least he was willing to admit it.
The colonel continued: “We’re establishing a course to give selected operators a broader technical foundation. Basic Electromagnetic and Autonomous Systems. BEAS.”
He slid a folder toward me. “We’d like you to attend and give us some input.”
I opened it. There were no promotion incentives, no special pay provisions, and no guarantee that the program would even exist five years from now.
“What’s the career path, sir?”
“We’re still developing that.”
“What’s my assignment afterward?”
“Also under consideration.”
I looked at him. “So you want me to go to a school that hasn’t been established yet, for a job that doesn’t exist, using equipment you don’t completely understand, with possible complications you can’t predict?”
The Navy commander coughed into his hand.
The colonel didn’t smile.
“That’s a fair summary, Staff Sergeant.”
I thought about Palmer, who could still feel a drone moving after he’d disconnected. I thought about the Marines in Venezuela who’d depended on information I could provide because of that same technology.
“All right, sir. I’m interested.”
BEAS was followed by months of testing, exercises, and arguments. Over the next two years, I helped write procedures for operating several unmanned systems together, although the hardware still required considerable modification. We experimented with communications interfaces and began studying whether the implant could help operators recognize patterns in electronic signals.
Some ideas worked, most didn’t. A few worked in ways nobody had anticipated.
We wrote down what we learned, tested it again, and argued over the results. Gradually, those notes became operating procedures. The procedures became training material.
Eventually, somebody decided the program needed its own specialty. Not everyone was pleased about that.
One major told me that Marines had been conducting reconnaissance and controlling aircraft perfectly well without having computers implanted in their heads, and he saw no reason to create cyborg killing machines. I told him that was true.
Then I asked whether he intended to stop using radios because Marines had once communicated perfectly well with signal flags, bugles, and smoke signals. He didn’t appreciate that either. I can be a pain in the ass like that. My attitude comes as standard issue with the red hair, and it isn’t always career-enhancing.
The Marine Corps eventually decided it needed officers who understood the technology well enough to supervise its development. I was selected for the warrant officer program. By the time I was promoted to Chief Warrant Officer Two, the experimental drone-control project had grown into something none of us would have recognized when we volunteered.
There were still only a handful of successful operators. The implants remained difficult to install, harder to master, and impossible to predict with certainty. We had no satisfactory explanation for the neurological problems that had ended so many promising careers, but one thing we did know was that only about one in every three thousand people had the neurological characteristics making them capable of successfully integrating with the implant.
We were in the early days of what would eventually become one of the most distrusted, yet sought-after specialties in the Marines. We didn’t even know what we could or even should do, but we were learning.
One afternoon, a young engineer asked me what I thought the system would eventually be capable of doing for the Marines. I considered the question.
I’d started with a drone that could barely lift off its platform. I’d watched Marines survive an ambush because I could see something they couldn’t. I’d helped write procedures for systems that hadn’t existed when I received my implant, and I still didn’t know why I could use the thing when so many others couldn’t.
“Son,” I told him, “I don’t think we’ve even figured out what questions to ask yet.”
It would turn out to have a much larger impact than any of us realized in those early days.
Race baiting
MLK, Jr Park
If you are wondering why that park in Winter Park, Florida is the topic of this post, read here.
The story is this 3 year old kid was playing soccer. The parents think he is the best thing to step on to a soccer field since Messi, and began questioning why the kid was pulled from the game. The coach responds that in that particular league, everyone plays. The parents get irate and make a scene while claiming how the kid is the best player on the team and should be left out there.
They are told to leave, they refuse. The father says you can’t make him leave, he paid hundreds of dollars for his kid to be out there. The cops are called. The parents set up a go fund me:
“It traumatized him, like he’s scared,” she said. “Like he’s scared to play soccer hard that we’re going to get kicked off of the next place.”
In the days since, a GoFundMe connected to the family has gained widespread support. Griffin says the “fundraiser has raised more than $40,000…eventually we’re going to get him overseas to play with people that appreciate his talent and take it as far as we go,”
Keep in mind: he is three. Three.
I used to coach little league football in a league for 6 to 11 year olds. One of the reasons I stopped was the parents. Some of the parents think their kids are too good for the rest of the team, and they will argue with coaches and staff about coaching style and how the team is playing the game, and it’s always that the team needs to revolve around their kid. It’s even worse when you see teams where those sorts of parents are the coaches.
At three years old, it’s impossible to tell if a child is going to be any good once they grow into adulthood, or even if they will WANT to play as an adult. They just want to have fun. The parents that are like this make it not fun for anyone.
Now combine that attitude with “I paid for my kid to play,” along with an attitude of “the cops are the evil enemy,” and “no one can tell me what to do,” then add in a bit of MLJ, Jr Park, and you have a recipe for GoFundMe drama.
Race baiting
Racism?
Today is laundry day here at AreaOcho. I had iHeart radio playing as I was putting the clean clothes away. A commercial came on, and the first words frankly just pissed me off.
I heard this commercial, so now you get to.
Imagine a white dude coming on the radio and saying some stupid, racist shit like that… and know that David Jolly is pushing this racist shit.
Ghost Story
About Ghosted
This story came to me because I saw a few news stories while I was researching material for this blog:
Elon Musk and Neuralink: Elon’s company implanted the first Neuralink nearly three years ago. This got me to thinking about how that could revolutionize thought. The basic concept for military application of controlling things with your mind was something I was aware of since I saw the Eastwood film Firefox.
I saw this article from Modern War about drone warfare. Drones are, according the article, not the future of warfare, but a problem to be solved. I disagree, and feel that this article is ignoring what I feel is going to be a HUGE change in how warfare is waged. We have drones that are submarines, ships, aircraft, and ground vehicles. I can build drones faster than I can train the men who operate them in combat, which is one of the basic rules in the world of our story. This is what they said:
The right question is not What can drones do? It is What can drones not do? And the answer to that question is both ancient and decisive: Drones cannot seize ground. They cannot hold it. They cannot compel a population to submit. They cannot plant a flag on a hilltop and mean it.
Submarines can’t keep sea lanes open, but they can deny them to others, yet submarine warfare changed much about Naval warfare. Maxim’s machine gun changed ground combat. Then so did the armored vehicle. Now drones.
Finally, there was this one from the Center for a New American Security: America isn’t ready for a drone war. This quote got me to thinking:
The drone threat in the Middle East, while serious and deadly, is negligible when compared to the capabilities of China, whose People’s Liberation Army will soon have the largest and most advanced drone force in the world…between October 2023 and May 2025, hundreds of Iranian-made one-way attack drones were fired at U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria and at ships in the Red Sea. Unable to detect the inbound drones more than several miles away, U.S. soldiers had less than two minutes to respond with a patchwork of defenses. Nevertheless, they shot down 80 percent of the more than 100 drones fired at them. At sea, U.S. sailors similarly intercepted most of the cheap Houthi drones but often used multimillion-dollar missiles to do so.
Then I watched as recent conflicts saw foes of the US like Iran and the Houthis launching thousands of $30,000 drones, while the US was still fighting yesterday’s war by using $10 million missiles in response.
Finally, there was this story on how the US was running out of missiles, and what an effect this would have on a future Taiwan conflict.
Those thoughts percolated, and that’s where the story was born. However, I wanted a new spin on it. As I said, this theme of neural implants isn’t new. What’s new here is the central secret of the story, which I am sure will be apparent to anyone paying attention. It’s that wrinkle that sets this story apart.
The story originally began as a short story. I was looking at just a chapter or two. The more I wrote, the more the story began filling out. The more it filled out, the more complex the war and its possibilities became. The world it’s set in grew into more than I could explain in just a few thousand words.
The characters in the story are people I have actually known. Some of them are people I’ve led into dangerous places to do hazardous things. Others are friends I have made along the way. Still others are compilations of personalities. It takes a certain type of person to do the things that most people consider to be insane. Whether it’s running into burning buildings, crawling across an enemy beach in the middle of the night, or sailing into harm’s way, the people who do those things tend to have a certain personality, and many of the characters in the story are simply carbon copies of those people.
What’s been most difficult for me is learning so much about my Marine brothers and their training pipelines so that I can try to create a new training pipeline for a technology that’s just in its infancy. As you read, you will discover that the neuros even have their own MOS, and it’s based upon real ones that exist today.
I’m using my own experience with the military, its training systems, the politics, and outright stupidity to create a world that, at least to me, seems realistic to anyone that has served.
Rigging the vote
Shenanigans
This is some third-world, failed state bullshit.
There are holes in the envelopes of California mail-in ballots. The left claims it’s so they can ensure a ballot won’t be mistakenly left in an envelope that’s thought to be empty. In some cases, the hole “accidentally” aligns with the way votes in certain cases are cast. A person can tell if a vote was cast a certain way without even opening the envelope, and it’s been going on since at least 2021.
In fact, rumors have been circulating that this is exactly what has been going on. These rumors have been so pervasive, the government has been trying to find plausible reasons why this is so.
California’s Secretary of State this week corrected false claims circulating in viral videos about the holes in mail-in ballot return envelopes, clarifying that they’re meant to assist visually impaired voters find the signature line — not to see the votes inside.
This sounds like some bullshit, but:
Are all envelopes the same? No — every county has its own envelope and ballot design. L.A. and Riverside counties have envelopes with three holes — two by the signature line and one overlapping hole on the other side of the envelope to help election workers verify that envelopes are empty after votes are processed. Orange County envelopes don’t have holes at all.
What if my vote does show through one of the holes? In those cases, election officials say that voters can fold or insert their ballot in a way where their vote remains hidden.
We aren’t cheating and using the holes to decide which ballots to keep and which get lost. Nope, and because you CAN refold your ballot to hide your vote means it’s all on the up and up.
However, they give instructions on how ballots should be placed in the envelope. When you fold it according to instructions, a certain candidate aligns with one of the three holes. So when processing the ballots, the person sorting them can tell if it the vote was cast for a certain candidate or a ballot voting for someone else. The hole needn’t line up with a Democrat. In fact, it’s better that it doesn’t, creating plausible deniability.
Instead, the hole can line up with something else on the ballot. Perhaps a vote for a hot-button issue. This permits a machine to exclude a ballot likely voting against the desired results- democrats being more likely to vote for gun control, free shit, or some other indicator. Use your imagination.
Now you know how it’s possible for 10,000 consecutive ballots to all come in for one candidate.
