A Short Story

Here is my attempt at a short story that’s been kicking around in my head for some time now. This is the first installment of that story.

Seventeen Warnings: HM2(FMF) Nelson’s debrief.

Petty Officer Second Class Nelson stood outside Major Rawlings’s office for nearly five minutes before knocking.

“Enter.”

Nelson stepped inside, came to attention, and announced himself.

“Petty Officer Second Class Nelson, Fifth Littoral Reconnaissance Team, Third Marine Littoral Regiment, reporting as ordered, ma’am.”

Major Rawlings didn’t look up from the tablet on her desk.

“Close the door, Petty Officer.”

Nelson closed it.

“Have a seat.”

He sat in the chair opposite her desk. Rawlings continued reading. Nelson recognized the deliberate silence. He’d seen officers use it before.

Finally, she set the tablet down.

“You’re the corpsman assigned to Fifth Littoral Reconnaissance Team?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And you were the designated medical monitor for the team’s Neuro during yesterday’s operation?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“How long have you held that assignment?”

“Twenty-six months, ma’am.”

“Same operator the entire time?”

“Yes, ma’am. Sergeant Collins.”

Rawlings studied him.

“Then I assume you know him rather well.”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“Better than I do?”

Nelson hesitated.

“I know him differently, ma’am.”

“Explain that.”

“Ma’am, you know his medical history. I know what he looks like when he’s lying about how he feels.”

Rawlings picked up her tablet.

“Apparently not well enough.”

Nelson said nothing.

“How is Sergeant Collins?”

“He’s in the hospital, ma’am.”

“I’m aware of that. I’m the physician responsible for his care. I asked how he is.”

“I haven’t been allowed to see him since yesterday.”

“That wasn’t my question.”

“No, ma’am.”

Rawlings waited.

“He’s not himself, ma’am.”

“Not himself how?”

“He gets confused. Says things that don’t make sense sometimes. He doesn’t always remember things right.”

“How long has that been going on?”

“Since the operation, ma’am.”

Rawlings tapped her tablet.

“Petty Officer, I have Sergeant Collins’s medical monitoring records for the past fourteen months. I have his AI’s cognitive performance reports. And I have your weekly assessments.”

Nelson said nothing.

“Let’s try that again. How long has Sergeant Collins been exhibiting symptoms?”

Nelson took a breath.

“A while, ma’am.”

“How long is a while?”

“I don’t know exactly.”

“Six months?”

“Maybe.”

“Nine?”

Nelson didn’t answer.

Rawlings turned the tablet toward him.

“Eight months ago, you reported that Sergeant Collins experienced an episode of transient sensory confusion. You attributed it to fatigue.”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“Seven months ago, you noted an incident in which he remembered a conversation that other members of the team insisted had never taken place.”

“He’d been linked for fourteen hours, ma’am. We were all exhausted.”

“Five months ago, he reported seeing an unidentified aircraft while disconnected. Nobody else saw it. No sensor recorded it.”

“Ma’am, with respect, that doesn’t necessarily mean—”

“I know what it doesn’t necessarily mean, Petty Officer. I’m asking what you thought it meant.”

Nelson stopped.

“Three months ago, you recorded a change in his affect. Irritability, emotional withdrawal, episodes of inappropriate laughter. You described it as operational stress.”

“That’s what I thought it was.”

“Was it?”

“I don’t know, ma’am.”

“You’re trained to recognize the early symptoms of Neural Integration Dissociation.”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“You’re trained to report them.”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And you’re authorized, even required, to suspend AI integration with his Neural implant pending medical evaluation under certain conditions.”

“Yes, ma’am.”

Rawlings set the tablet down.

“Then tell me why Sergeant Collins was still linking.”

Nelson stared at the floor.

“Because he was still good at his job, ma’am.”

“That’s not a medical assessment.”

“No, ma’am.”

“It’s not an answer, either.”

Nelson raised his eyes.

“Ma’am, you weren’t there.”

Rawlings regarded him without expression.

“No, Petty Officer. I wasn’t.”

“He kept us alive. Over and over. There are men on that team who wouldn’t be breathing if it wasn’t for Collins.”

“And now he’s in my hospital.”

Nelson looked away.

“Do you know why you’re here, Petty Officer?”

“To discuss yesterday’s operation, ma’am.”

“You’re here because I have a Neuro in my ward with extensive neurological damage, and the medical telemetry indicates that his designated corpsman received seventeen separate warnings to terminate the neural connection.”

Nelson stared at a spot on the wall behind her.

“Seventeen,” Rawlings repeated. “The last six were mandatory disconnect orders. Not advisories. Orders.”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“You acknowledged every one of them.”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And you did not disconnect him.”

“No, ma’am.”

Rawlings leaned back.

“Then perhaps you’d like to explain why.”

Nelson looked at the tablet.

“How much of the mission recording have you reviewed, ma’am?”

“All of it.”

“The whole thing?”

“Every second.”

“Then you saw what happened.”

“I saw what the AI recorded, Petty Officer. Now I want you to tell me what happened.”

Nelson sat silently for several seconds.

Rawlings waited.

“Where would you like me to start, ma’am?”

“With the contact.”

“Which contact?”

“The enemy reconnaissance element.”

“Yes, ma’am.”

He rubbed his palms against his trousers.

“We were on the western coast of Taiwan. Fifth Team had been assigned to observe a suspected landing area. The Chinese were expected to attempt an amphibious landing within the next seventy-two hours, and we were looking for advance reconnaissance activity.”

“Was your team conducting beach reconnaissance?”

“Yes, ma’am. We’d been there two nights. We were checking the approaches, the seawall, the roads leading inland. Mostly trying to determine whether the enemy had already started preparing the beach.”

“And had they?”

“We didn’t know yet.”

“What happened?”

“Collins found them.”

“Explain.”

“At first we thought it was just another ghost.”

Rawlings looked up.

“Define ghost.”

“An electronic decoy, ma’am. False activity. Something meant to draw attention away from whatever was actually happening.”

“Was Collins linked?”

“Yes, ma’am. Full integration. His AI was controlling our reconnaissance drones and managing our electronic protection.”

“And you were monitoring him?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“What did he report?”

“Activity near the southern end of the beach. A few returns that didn’t make sense. Equipment signatures where there shouldn’t have been any. Then they disappeared.”

“Did he identify them as enemy personnel?”

“Not immediately. He said somebody was lying to us.”

Rawlings glanced at her tablet.

“Those were his words?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“What did he mean?”

“He meant that the electronic picture was too clean. Things were disappearing in ways that suggested somebody was making them disappear.”

“Go on.”

“Collins started comparing what our drones were seeing with the passive sensors. He said the beach wasn’t empty. It was being made to look empty.”

“Did he have visual confirmation?”

“Not yet.”

“Then what happened?”

“One of our drones saw movement near an abandoned maintenance building. Three figures. Maybe four. They were carrying equipment toward the seawall.”

“Chinese reconnaissance?”

“That’s what we figured. A beach reconnaissance platoon, or part of one. They’d come ashore ahead of the main force to prepare the landing area.”

“Did they know you were there?”

“Not at first.”

“How do you know?”

“Because they were still working.”

Rawlings waited.

“We could see them setting equipment down, moving around the building, checking the beach approaches. Collins said they were establishing a sensor network. Maybe communications relays, maybe electronic markers for the landing force. We couldn’t tell exactly.”

“And your officer in charge?”

“Lieutenant Mercer ordered us to remain concealed and continue observing. We weren’t supposed to engage unless discovered.”

“Then how did the engagement begin?”

Nelson’s expression changed.

“They found us.”

“How?”

“We don’t know for certain. Collins said their AI had noticed something inconsistent in the electronic background. Something about the way our drones were interacting with the environment.”

“Was that confirmed?”

“No, ma’am.”

“What happened next?”

“Everything started lying.”

Rawlings put down her stylus.

“Explain that, Petty Officer.”

“Our drone feeds showed people moving where there weren’t any people. The passive sensors reported transmissions from locations that were physically empty. We had weapon detections coming from abandoned structures. Then some of the feeds went blank. Others kept showing pictures, but Collins said they weren’t current.”

“Cyber intrusion?”

“That’s what he called it. Some of our systems were being fed information that didn’t agree with the others.”

“And the enemy drones?”

“They came in right after that. Small ones at first. We heard them before we saw them. Then a couple of the larger ones appeared over the beach.”

“Armed?”

“Some of them. Others were carrying electronic payloads. We couldn’t tell which was which until they started doing things.”

“What things?”

“One of our observation drones stopped responding. Another began reporting contacts in the wrong direction. Then something hit the ground about twenty meters from our forward position.”

“An explosive?”

“Yes, ma’am. Small, but close enough.”

“Did you take casualties?”

“Not then.”

“And Collins?”

Nelson paused.

“Collins was magnificent.”

Rawlings said nothing.

“He kept our drones working. He kept the enemy from getting a clear picture of where we were. He was talking to the lieutenant, coordinating the AI, moving our drones around, and warning the team about things we couldn’t see. We were getting hit from every direction, electronically and physically, and he was keeping it together.”

“His medical condition, Petty Officer.”

“His readings were elevated. Heart rate, neural load, stress indicators. But nothing we hadn’t seen before.”

“Was he exhibiting any cognitive abnormalities?”

“Not at first.”

“Not at first?”

Nelson looked at the floor.

“He started talking to somebody.”

“Who?”

“I thought it was the AI.”

“Was it?”

“I don’t know.”

“What did he say?”

“He said, ‘I know. I can see them.’ Then he said, ‘Stop showing me that.'”

“Did you ask him who he was talking to?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“What did he tell you?”

“He said he was talking to his mother.”

Rawlings was still.

“His mother?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“Did you know Sergeant Collins’s mother is deceased?”

Nelson nodded.

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And what did you do?”

Nelson swallowed.

“I told him to concentrate. Told him we needed him.”

“Did you consider disconnecting him?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“Why didn’t you?”

“Because the enemy was still attacking us.”

“Petty Officer—”

“Ma’am, I understand what you’re asking. I do. But you have to understand what it was like. We had enemy drones overhead, our communications were being disrupted, and we were taking fire from people we couldn’t locate. Collins was the only reason we weren’t dead.”

Rawlings watched him.

“Was he still performing effectively?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“How do you know?”

“Because we were still alive.”

“That’s not the same thing.”

Nelson opened his mouth, then closed it.

Rawlings looked down at the tablet.

“According to the medical record, that was the first of seventeen disconnect warnings.”

Nelson nodded.

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And the next sixteen?”

Nelson stared at her.

“Things got worse.”

Antifascism, you say?

The County Commission of Polk County, Florida will be voting this morning on a resolution to shut off public comments on the county’s social media sites, claiming that they are doing so because “the county’s comment sections became hotbeds for incorrect information, personal attacks, and vulgar comments.” The county defines incorrect information as being anything contrary to what they say.

What happening is people are going to government websites and calling out their governments for spreading incorrect and misleading information about taxes and budgeting in the fight for Amendment 3. Fighting fascism by silencing the public.

Remember when Trump did this, and a judge ruled it was unconstitutional to block a public forum? It was Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump (May 23, 2018)

Subscription Service

In the comments on property taxes, people in the comments were talking about making things like the fire service into a subscription service, or perhaps using fees each time that service is called. Like most things, those methods have been tried (and are being used in some areas), have been talked about on this blog, and largely don’t work. Let’s take a look:

Subscription Fees

Charge a small fee for fire departments to respond to members’ homes. Anyone who isn’t a member, too bad for you. Of course, there will be those who take their chances, and some of them will lose. That is, they will decide they will save some money by not paying the fees, then will try to gin up public support when they lose the bet, their home is on fire, and the fire department refuses to come out. In fact, that is exactly what happened in rural Tennessee back in 2010.

The South Fulton Fire Department charged a $75 annual fee to be a member of their fire association. Those who paid the fee were eligible for that fire department to come out and put out any fires on your property. Gene Cranick chose to roll the dice and not pay the fee, thereby saving himself that $75 a year. On September 29, 2010, he lost that bet and his house caught fire.

The fire started when the Cranicks’ grandson was burning trash near the family home. As it grew out of control, the Cranicks called 911, but the fire department from the nearby city of South Fulton would not respond.

“We wasn’t on their list,” he said the operators told him. So now he complains that he should have been able to pay the fee after the fire started, so the firefighters would come out, but the fire department refused.

That makes sense, because allowing people to pay the $75 AFTER the fire has already started would mean no one would pay unless they actually had a fire. That just isn’t economically feasible for the continued operation of any fire department. It’s akin to allowing people to pay life insurance premiums after the insured person is already dead.

In the case of subscription fire services, the only way this model works is when the cost of the department is spread across a large number of people. You each pay a small fee so that the large cost of a fire department is spread across many people, making it cheaper. Allowing people to not pay until they have a fire is a pay for service model.

Pay Per Service

Firefighting used to be a private for-profit industry. In the 1800’s, the early days of urbanization, in cities like New York and Baltimore, there were private companies who were in charge of putting out fires. The way it functioned was the first company at the scene got money from the insurance company to put out the fire. So, they had an incentive to get there fast. They also had an incentive to sabotage competition. They also often ended up getting into fist fights over territory and many times buildings would burn down while firefighters were busy punching each other in front of it.

Firefighters were hired, not for their prowess in putting out fires, but for their ability to brawl. One tactic that used to be employed was the “plug guard.” These were people hired to race to the scene of a fire, place a barrel over the fire plug, and sit on it, thereby securing the water source for his employer’s exclusive use.

Rivalry among the volunteers was the cause for the establishment of the country’s first paid fire department in Cincinnati in 1853. In 1851, two of the city’s volunteer fire companies crossed paths on the way to a fire, and before the fight was over, ten companies were involved. Help was sent from Covington, Kentucky, across the river-not help to put out the fire, but to assist one of the companies in the fist fight. The building burned to the ground.

The problem here is that fire departments get few fires. The department that I work for responds to less than 300 fires a year, yet has a $20 million budget. Except for large commercial buildings, the fees required to make this profitable would be more than the value of the building. A homeowner would probably refuse to pay a $60,000 fee for a $200,000 house that’s on fire, because now that fee is on top of the $70,000 in damage caused by the fire and the efforts to extinguish it. What if the fire spreads to more than one house? Does each homeowner have to agree to pay before the fire department can act? Or only one? If only one, do they all have to pay a share of the bill, or does the homeowner who made the decision pay the costs of putting out all of the houses? What if someone notices that you house is on fire while you are away at work? Who pays in that case: the person who called, or the homeowner?

For those reasons, pay for service just doesn’t work.

Libertarianism

These methods are both a variation of the libertarian mindset, which just can’t work. Why won’t it work?  The Libertarian philosophy will never work because people always want the power to make others give them what they want, but never want to pay for it. Everyone has their issue: the homeless, healthcare, Fire service, whatever.

There are only two ways to get people to do things for you: voluntarily, or involuntarily. Do you think that people should interact voluntarily? If so, then you must allow people to set the standard by which they will provide that care.

If the doctor says that he will only provide care for money, and the patient has no money, then there are only four options:

A. You pay the bill on the other person’s behalf (voluntary donation)
B. You force the provider to provide the service/product for free (forced compliance- slavery)
C. You allow the provider to turn the non-paying person away (voluntary noncooperation)
D. You force others to pay the bill (forced donation- legalized theft)

Libertarians believe that the only fair and proper answer is A or C.
Socialists believe that the only proper answer is B or D.

For those who believe that we have a responsibility to feed/clothe/care for people who cannot pay, just how do you think that the people providing the service will provide it?

How will the hospital pay its staff? How will the fire trucks get fuel? How will restaurants get food for the homeless? How much of your own money have you given to the cause? Do you allow a homeless man to live in your spare bedroom?

If you are not willing to use your own money and resources to provide that service or product, then why do you get to compel me to use mine? Giving away other people’s money and possessions is not charity.

The only way that fire service (or police, military, and courts) makes ethical and moral sense is for the cost to be shared across the entire community, whether through subscription fees or taxes. If it’s through subscription fees, then the fire department has the option of not responding to your property, just as was done in South Fulton. If through taxes, then the people have a right and a duty to make sure their money is being property spent and safeguarded.

I am not opposed to property taxes, but they should be done in such a way that everyone pays the same amount and receives the same service, no exceptions. Ad valorem taxes based upon a speculative value, and having exemptions, special favors, and carve outs is just robbing Peter to pay Paul. We all know Paul will love this deal, but doesn’t Peter get a say?

Property Taxes

Take a moment to read this discussion of property taxes.

In my area, there are fees for fire. It’s a flat fee of about $400, to pay for the fire department. That’s not an ad valorem tax, so it isn’t based upon the value of my house. All homes in the area are charged this flat fee. Commercial and apartment buildings pay different rates. That’s as it should be- everyone receives the same service, everyone pays the same rate.
This is what I imagine taxes becoming if Amendment 3 passes. Everyone pays the same rate for the same service. The cost of services divided by the number of tax parcels should equal the amount of taxes everyone pays.

Canadian Military Explosion

A live fire exercise resulted in high casualty counts, according to reports.

Report from an Army vet:

Accounts from someone on the firing line was it was a shoulder fired HE round that “Dolphined” after it left the tube and went astray. NOT artillery. This round hit a gas well which exploded and flattened the 3 Kill Houses that were full of troops which happened to be in close proximity of the well. Approx 300 troops inside and many waiting outside them. There is nothing but splinters left of them. This also started a major fire that was fed by high winds that swept through the main Bivouac site housing the majority of troops in the field. The amount of injured is staggering and the fatality count IS going to climb as they recover more victims. In my 20+ years in the Army, I have only heard of a dolphining round happening once from a shoulder fired rocket. Not sure what would cause this other than possibly a faulty propellent.

Electrical Work

No post this morning because I was busy yesterday. It was time to fix the tripping breaker problem I was troubleshooting a few days ago. If you will recall, I had a problem with the breaker tripping repeatedly for the receptacles in two of our bedrooms: one was use as a guest room, and one that we use as an office/sitting room. It turned out the wire running from one receptacle to another, even though it was disconnected from everything, was only measuring 2 ohms between the neutral and ground wires. That will trip the breaker (GFI) every time. It was probably caused by a staple, nail, or nail plate rubbing through the insulation on the wire.

I isolated the bad section by cutting it out of the upstream box, which of course orphans the downstream box. The breaker reset once I did that, but now I have a dead receptacle. The dead plug is the one on the left. (I took pictures of my entire house while it was under construction, before they put the drywall, insulation, and vapor barriers in. That really comes in handy. I know where every stud, wire, pipe, and duct is)

There is no way to fix that shorted Romex, the wire must be replaced if we want that plug to ever work again. The bad news is the receptacle before the bad wire is on one wall, and the receptacle after the bad wire is on another: the Romex goes around a corner. That is going to be nearly impossible to do without tearing out a lot of drywall.

The good news is there is a dedicated receptacle on the same wall that I could tap into. You can see it on the right side of the above photo, it’s the one supplied by the yellow Romex. It’s the only receptacle on that 20 amp circuit, so I can just add the orphaned plug to that. Since it’s a 20 amp breaker, I can’t use 14 gauge wire, so I went to Lowe’s and got 25 feet of 12/2 wire bright and early in the morning.

I cut two holes in the drywall, about 8 inches beneath each receptacle. I also had to notch out that furring strip you see on the right. Once I did that, you will note that there is a straight, unobstructed path between those two points and pulled Romex through the intervening space, because the only one of the furring strips goes all the way to the floor.

Now I have a wire running from one to the other, but the boxes are recessed into the concrete blocks. I fixed that with a hammer drill to put a 3/4 inch hole in the concrete block 8 inches below each box. Now it was a simple manner of pulling the ends of the wires through the hole, up through the bottom of the box, and wiring everything in.

I still needed to notch the furring strip in this photo:

A bit of drywall patching. I like using the color changing mud, because it’s so much easier to tell when it’s dry. It leaves a flat looking spot on the wall that clashes with the orange peel finish, so once it dries, I sand it smooth before mixing some of the mud with some water to thin it to about the consistency of waffle batter. Then I roll it on with a foam roller, and it makes a pretty convincing orange peel surface.

Then test the plugs. All done. The entire fix, including a 2 hour trip to Lowe’s ate up my Saturday. The wife will paint the patches, once the mud dries. Painting his her territory.

They Who Must Not Be Named

I have spoken of vzyali quite a few times on this blog. I learned the term from my Scoutmaster when I was a boy scout as a teenager. Greg (I used his first name for security reasons) had escaped from the Soviet Union in the 1950’s as a teenager when his parents managed to smuggle him across the border in the trunk of a car. He never saw his parents again, they were vzyali.

He used to tell me stories of what it was like to live in the Soviet Union. How they used to spy on and watch everyone, to the point where you were required to bring your unsealed envelopes for mailing to their post office. The officials would read your mail to ensure it contained nothing disloyal before sealing and passing the envelope on.

Vzyali is one of the most chilling linguistic phenomena of the Soviet era, particularly during Stalin’s Great Terror in the 1930s. In that context, “Vzyali” translates more accurately to “They took [him/her/them]” or “They’ve taken.” It was used as an absolute, terrifying euphemism.

  • The Unspeakable “They”: Everyone knew exactly who “they” were—the NKVD (the Soviet secret police, later the KGB)—but naming them aloud was incredibly dangerous. By omitting the pronoun or noun, citizens avoided speaking the name of the state security apparatus, which could invite suspicion upon themselves.
  • Avoiding Legal Terms: People rarely said “arrestovani” (arrested) because “arrest” implied a legitimate legal process, a charge, and a system of justice. “Vzyali” stripped away any illusion of legality; it meant a person was simply plucked from their life, usually in the dead of night, never to be seen again.
  • The Atmosphere of Fear: The word captured the arbitrary, predator-like nature of the regime. To say someone was “taken” meant they had vanished into the Gulag system or been executed, and their family was left to live in terror of being “taken” next.

This linguistic coping mechanism is famously documented in Soviet dissident literature, including Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago and Anna Akhmatova’s poem Requiem, reflecting how totalitarianism alters language itself to express trauma.

Our scoutmaster was a good man, but he passed away a few months ago. He and his wife became good friends with my own parents. They lived a few miles from us, and I remember they used to visit often. Pat’s specialty was mango pies, Greg’s specialty was teaching me skills like living in the woods, washing dishes without water, and other useful skills. His wife Pat died a few years ago.

No one hated communists more than Greg, and he would let you know why. All you had to do was get to know him. He loved the US with everything he had, and did more to serve this country than most who were born here. He left a lasting impression upon me, and is a huge reason why I am as opposed to the communist movement that the left has become.

Oregon School Shooting

Now that the dust is settling and actual facts are coming out, I can post what the cops have released:

At 12:58 p.m. PT yesterday, two vehicles were traveling near Silver Rail Elementary, he said. At that time the suspect approached a fence area of the school from an undeveloped area, crossed the street, threw his weapon over the fence, then climbed the fence onto the school property, Krantz said.

A driver of a red Toyota pickup saw the suspect and“verbally confronted him,” the chief said. The suspect then fired at the pickup, hitting it at least three times.

The driver eventually kept driving and made the initial 911 call.

The driver of a second vehicle — a 36-year-old man whose children attend the school — witnessed the shooting involving the pickup. That man then drove into the school’s parking lot as the suspect was walking along the south side of the school and broke in.

The suspect was identified by police as Griffin J. John II, a 16-year-old Bend resident. He was armed with a long gun and gained entry into the school by shooting through locked doors. He was a special needs student in that school in the past.

The 36-year-old man parked his car, took out a 40-caliber pistol that he had “legally secured in his vehicle,” and went toward the school, Krantz said.

He heard the shooting and saw a teacher involved in a physical altercation with the suspect. He then entered the classroom and fired his weapon, “striking the suspect multiple times.”